Analisis Pengungkapan Sustainabilty Report Berdasarkan Standar GRI 400 Pada Sektor Properti
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54951/sintama.v6i2.1267Keywords:
Sustainability Report, GRI 400, Social Disclosure, Property SectorAbstract
This study aims to analyze sustainability report disclosures based on the GRI 400 standards in property sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The study used content analysis of sustainability reports for the 2024 period. Disclosure levels were measured using the GRI 400 disclosure index, which covers 36 social aspect indicators. The results show that property sector companies, on average, disclose only 28% of the GRI 400 indicators. A minimum value of 0 indicates that some companies do not disclose social aspects at all, while a maximum value of 0.75 indicates that no company has fully disclosed all GRI 400 indicators. Furthermore, a standard deviation value of 0.26 indicates significant variation in disclosure across companies. These findings indicate that social aspect disclosure practices in property sector companies' sustainability reports are still uneven and incomplete. Increased corporate commitment and a strengthened role of regulators are needed to encourage sustainability reporting in accordance with Global Reporting Initiative standards.
References
Deegan, C. (2019). Financial accounting theory (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). GRI standards. Global Reporting Initiative. https://www.globalreporting.org
Gunawan, J. (2015). Corporate social disclosures in Indonesia: Stakeholders’ influence and motivations. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(3), 535–552. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-04-2014-0048
Guthrie, J., & Abeysekera, I. (2006). Content analysis of social, environmental reporting: What is new? Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 10(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/14013380610703120
Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005
Hermawan, A., & Mulyawan, S. (2014). Pengaruh kinerja lingkungan terhadap pengungkapan CSR. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 11(1), 1–20.
Lestari, A., & Rachmawati, S. (2019). Sustainability reporting pada perusahaan properti yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 10(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2019.04.10004
Pratiwi, D., & Prabowo, M. (2021). Analisis pengungkapan aspek sosial berdasarkan standar GRI 400 pada perusahaan non-keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 25(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol25.iss2.art5
Raar, J. (2002). Environmental initiatives: Towards triple bottom line reporting. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 7(3), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280210436781
Sari, N., Putra, A., & Wibowo, R. (2022). Pengungkapan standar GRI 400 pada perusahaan publik di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 19(1), 67–82.
Tarigan, J., & Semuel, H. (2014). Pengungkapan sustainability report dan kinerja perusahaan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 16(2), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.9744/jak.16.2.88-101
Violeta, E., Azmi, Z. & Suci, R. G. (2025). Does sustainability report disclosure affect financial performance? Evidence from the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Universitas Jambi, 10(3), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.22437/jaku.v10i03.47475
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rafil Rafil, Muhammad Ridho, Kornella Kitty Sitanggang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
